Monday, March 17, 2008

600

"Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: 'Mankind.' Basically, it's made up of two separate words—'mank' and 'ind'. What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind."- Jack Handy
This is my six hundredth post. A while back I decided that I would post something about the post number every hundred posts. I didn't consider how difficult it is finding a topic about six hundred, though. The number really does not have much significance. However, the book of Revelation describes the six as the number for man, so this is a post about the topic of how I perceive mankind.

Probably what interests me the most about humanity in general are the unexpected similarities and the unexpected differences among people throughout the world. I think the similarities can best be seen in the stories that come from different cultures. Universally, people appreciate heroic traits and traits of self-sacrifice. That may make some sense in that those two traits should prolong the existence of a specific culture. This could also explain the fact that the Crucifixion story has been accepted in cultures worldwide.

Another similarity that C.S. Lewis noted in Mere Christianity was that most cultures have an inherent sense of right and wrong. While a lot of the details regarding this sense may differ, there are more similarities than differences. Again, it could be argued that any culture without a sense of right or wrong would eventually destroy itself in selfish chaos, but there should at least be some record of them if they existed.

I am convinced that most differences between cultures are learned differences and not natural differences. Even so, it is amazing how foundational ways of thinking can differ. Americans tend to be very individualistic. In some Asian cultures there is not really such a thing as individual success, but rather group or family success. It is probably a reflection of American selfishness, but I cannot fathom not approaching life individualistically.

I think that for all of the differences, though, you will still find people of all personality types no matter where you go. If someone described themselves as American, French, Japanese, or Mexican, that still shouldn't tell you too much about their personality outside of the cultural rules by which they play.

One of the biggest questions that perplexes me, because it is something that I cannot know for certain, is whether there is a universal human experience or whether all people are totally unique in the way they experience life. Everything else about the nature of people in general and individually has to flow from that.

5 comments:

f o r r e s t said...

Congrats on 600. You are the man!

GoldenSunrise said...

Wouldn't a "universal human experience" be having children or going through puberty? (for example)

f o r r e s t said...

600 down and 66 to go and then the apocalypse.

shakedust said...

Those are definitely standard and frequent human experiences. I guess what I am thinking about is whether there is a universal perception of experience. So, is the experience of childbirth more or less universal from the perspective of the people going through it?

The four riders better be getting their steeds ready.

Portland wawa said...

I don't think that the experience of childbirth is universal. I believe that the people that I work with, from Japan, Korea, Iraq, China, England, Scotland, Germany and America, all experience life in completely different ways. After working with people from around the world for a while, you see that culture plays a big role in perception. So I agree with this statement: "all people are totally unique in the way they experience life"