I've heard the term "toxic masculinity" used a lot recently. I don't think I had ever heard it before a year or two ago. I've never been the most masculine of men, but I'm not by any stretch effeminate. So, I think I can maintain some objectivity on this specific subject. Rather than write specifically on this subject, though, what I would like to do is use it as an illustration as to why terms like this are particularly frustrating. Specifically, labels like this are used by people on all sides of an issue to either label everything they don't like as evil or to portray themselves as being under attack.
A real, valid, and useful definition of "toxic masculinity" would probably be something to the effect of, "Socially reinforcing negative behaviors in boys and men by creating arbitrary standards that associate negative behaviors with masculinity and positive behaviors with femininity." I've seen and fallen prey to that. Boys need respect from their peers, and a lot of times doing the right thing is also doing the girly thing--or so I have felt. I've been the boy/man left to feel less masculine for doing the right thing. I've been the boy/man who did the wrong thing in order to feel or appear more masculine. I've also negatively reinforced behavior among others. As a society, in our smaller sub-cultures, and in our families, this is what we should be addressing. There will be disagreement about how that's addressed, but I'd hope we could agree that this should be a priority. This gets at the root of a lot of criminal activity and actions that leads to broken families. It's a big deal.
All of this being said, there are those who would want to take advantage of the term to knock all things masculine. These folks are not be in the majority by any stretch, but they can be vocal. I've definitely heard plenty of opinions about how everything in the world would be better if it were run by women.
As a counterpoint, there are those who hear people taking advantage of the term and assume that "toxic masculinity" is part of a larger cultural attack on masculinity. As a result, they do not take as seriously the crimes committed through "toxic masculinity" because they sense a danger in giving too much cultural sway to the anti-masculinists. They also view any criticism on the things they deem masculine as an attack on manhood itself.
This situation leads to the pitched battles we see today in society where people dig in and fight each other rather than understanding each other.
Perhaps the real antidote to the current situation is for discussion to move beyond blaming toxic masculinity, and to focus on what real positive masculinity is. It can't be just what women want it to be, or what men want it to be, or what "the man" wants it to be. It needs to be naturally masculine, but having a positive effect on society. A lot of the traits I consider to be masculine do that already, and so the challenge is not changing everything about men but rather identifying the places where they go astray and focusing on those. I'm sure this could be done for women too, but I haven't heard the term "toxic femininity" referenced in the media yet so I haven't given that angle much thought.
I think these sorts of issues come up with a lot of terms we use today, and have potentially been issues in the past as well. I've heard tens of definitions of "feminism." By some definitions I'd be a feminist. By most I would not. But the ambiguity around the term allows people to throw the word around in an argument and seem like they have a well-formulated position when they don't understand the basics of what their "opponent" believes. I'd bet that if people to get beyond the term and focus on the issues the term represents that a lot of our arguments would melt away into societal compromises and solutions that almost everyone could agree with.
Labels should be short-hand ways for us to shorten the description of something we already understand rather than tools we use to keep from learning about what we don't fully understand yet.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment