One of my biggest weaknesses that I'm aware of is that I get defensive quickly and easily. I think that most people have a threshold at which they get defensive, but mine is more sensitive than most others. I've been working to correct this for years, but it has been slow going.
I think a big reason I get defensive is that I envision being held accountable for things beyond the bounds of what I should be held accountable for, and probably beyond the bounds of what I will be held accountable for. Someone expresses displeasure in some way, and my gut reaction is to make that a problem I'm responsible for. Sometimes it's not actually a problem that needs to be solved. Sometimes it's a problem, but it's not my problem. Sometimes the issue is less severe than my gut wants to make it. In most cases, defensiveness is not called for, and I'm getting better at it--but slowly!
Part of what is hard about correcting defensiveness is knowing what the proper bounds of accountability are. If the lines are blurry for what I'm responsible for, I'll assume that I'm responsible for everything in that grey area. A lot of the time when I go above and beyond the call of duty or when I over-prepare for things it's because I'm not sure where that line is, and it's far safer, though more exhausting, to take more responsibility than not enough.
This is something that I don't think gets addressed enough. People will frequently talk about the importance of setting boundaries, but many times those same people talk about how important it is to chip in and do your part. Implicit in those statements is that the audience will understand where the boundaries are for what is my responsibility and what is not. It's not a question of being unwilling to set boundaries, but rather a question of understanding where those boundaries should really be.
I hear a lot of people talk about the 80/20 rule (I've done it myself). Maybe a better way of looking at the 80/20 rule is that the people in those two groups have different standards for where their boundaries should be, and perhaps both groups aren't entirely right.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment