With the upcoming presidential election we have had more discussions with the kids about politics in the past few months than ever before. I'm not entirely comfortable with that.
While, as anyone who reads this page regularly knows, I am very interested in political issues, I also don't think that there is any ideal way to discuss most political issues with elementary-aged kids. Kids are naturally inclined to think in very black and white terms and think of people as good or bad (This is different than the Christian view of good and bad where everyone is in the "bad" category.). I believe that is a dangerous view to bring into politics, and so I am nervous about us introducing our kids to more than a surface level of politics. Even going to far as to imply that one party is better or worse than another is concerning because that introduces an "Us versus Them" mentality that can lead to bad places.
My belief is that politics, more than anything else, is proof positive that no matter what you believe, there are scoundrels who will try to win your vote by agreeing with you. My experience is that there is little to no correlation between political viewpoint and integrity. The liars and the selfishly ambitious reside in all levels of the political perspective, as do those who are principled and true to their beliefs. I do not currently believe that people are good or bad (or dishonest or principled) based on whether they agree with me politically because I have years of life experience to tell me otherwise. It's hard not to think that way as a kid, though. I know because I remember thinking that way. It's just a natural, human inclination.
Even explaining the political issues that drive our positions is precarious. We recently had a difficult discussion with CD regarding abortion. It would be easy for someone who against abortion (or for it) to simply paint those who disagree as being evil and leave things at that. Alas, many do. Few positions are more genuinely held than ones regarding abortion, though, so it is wrong not to acknowledge the reasoning of those who disagree.
I don't want CD or NJ to grow up without empathy for those who have to make difficult choices in life, even if we ultimately disagree to the point of being appalled with the results of those decisions. This is especially because everyone has made appalling decisions at some point in their lives. I also don't want to give them something to rebel against once they grow to understand that those who disagree with Mom and Dad often have reasons that seem reasonable and valid. Change one or two assumptions about underlying truth, and right and wrong can change dramatically.
All of this just leads back to my original point. I can't wait until this election is over and we can move on from discussing politics in this house.
Friday, February 12, 2016
kids and politics
Labels:
cd,
doctrine and philosophy,
internal links,
nj,
parenting,
politics,
social observation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment