Along with teaching Sunday School, I also alternate with someone else teaching a men's class at church. I could take the easy way out with video series, and I am leaving myself open to the possibility in the future, but I have been doing expository teaching through different books of the Bible.
What I hate teaching (or sitting through a lesson on) the most is something that everyone in the room already knows. If I know a passage or a topic has been taught repetitively and I don't have something new to bring to the table, I really don't enjoy teaching the lesson. Because of this, I am drawn to teaching things that others have not focused on, for one reason or another.
All of this is to say that I decided a while back to teach the Song of Songs in the men's class. I used two books in planning my lessons (The Song of Solomon: An Invitation to Intimacy by O'Donnell and Exalting Jesus in the Song of Songs by Akin and Platt). I am going to be wrapping up the series in early August, and so have pretty much gotten through the entire book. I have included some thoughts I have about teaching the book below.
- I never appreciated the true spiritual value of the Song. Marriage represents the Church and Christ, and so the quality of union we have with our spouse reflects how we value the relationship between Christ and the Church. The purpose of the Song is to celebrate and promote Godly marriage that properly reflects the relationship between God and His people.
- I never appreciated the context and target audience of the Song. This is probably a song (or series of songs) meant to be sung at a wedding celebration, and targeted to unmarried girls. One can imagine singers taking the roles of husband and wife, and a choir of girls singing the "friends" parts. Who the target audience is explains a lot of the content in the book, not the least of which are the three commands in the Song to not forfeit one's virginity too quickly.
- I did not appreciate that reading this song literally is a relatively recent approach. For centuries commentators assumed that the book is a metaphor for God and the Church or God and Israel. The Song couldn't be about intimacy between a married couple because that would degrade the Holy Scripture. This is a perspective that seems laughable today, and it is a ridiculous position, but it was the de facto position of all of Christianity and Judaism for over a millennium.
- Some weeks were flat-out awkward because my sources assumed that if something could be describing a very intimate part of the body or intimate action that was probably the correct interpretation.
- I used to have a real problem with the Song because I believed that the man in the Song was Solomon. One of my sources (Akin/Platt) believes that this is true, but my other source (O'Donnell) believes that Solomon is only introduces for comparison purposes. This is appealing for a few reasons, one of which is that it solves the very difficult challenge with the book that the Song does not describe a polygamist's marriage. This would conflict with the mutual ownership that the woman expresses throughout the Song (Song 2:16; 6:3; 7:10), as well as with the fact that polygamy was not God's perfect ideal for marriage. I agree with O'Donnell that Song of Songs is written by Solomon to describe a different, idealized couple.
- I did not realize that the Song was written very much with the intent of praising the value of virginity. Apart from the commands to wait for love in the Song, there are a couple of clear indications that the woman (This song is targeted to girls) saved herself for marriage. First, in the honeymoon chapter her husband refers to her body as a locked garden and a sealed fountain, indicating that she has closed herself off from men until this time (Song 4:12). Second, in the conclusion the woman describes herself as a wall in comparison to a door, which likely establishes her virginity because a wall is not entered but a door is (Song 8:10).
The most practical lesson I have gotten from teaching Song of Songs is that a husband has a responsibility to praise his wife's beauty to her frequently and in detail, and see her as his standard for beauty, Likewise, a wife has a responsibility to periodically make herself physically available to her husband. Those points sum up about half of the book.
I am looking forward to being done with this series. That is less about the awkwardness of the topic and more about the time I have to spend in preparing these lessons. I'm ready for a less-involved series.
